Weblog maken

Home Loggy in Loggy starten Top 100 Forum Meer
Hoe werkt het? Klik hier
Begin pagina
loggy.nl Home
Weblog maken
RSS Feed


<< vorige | Hoofdmenu | Volgende >>

Nike Kobe 4 Protro Performance Review

Just a Retro. Not a protro. Not much has changed in ten years. The Kobe 4 Protro offers the same pattern and the same soft bite as the original Kobe 4. Traction does start off a little slick, but most Nikeís have been having the same issue as of late. A little bit of break-in time may be required to rub off whatever residue is leftover from the manufacturing process, but once thatís done then itís pretty much smooth sailing from there. The rubber seems to be slightly softer than what I remember, so there has been some peeling in a few of my personal high-wear areas of the outsole. Not sure if this will be a common occurrence for everyone, but this has been my experience thus far. Outdoor hoopers will receive great traction, but due to the softer rubber compound Iím not sure if itíll be quite as durable as the OG. However, most should be more than happy with the traction no matter if youíre indoors or outdoors. Full length Zoom AirÖ just kidding. The Protro edition of the Kobe 4 is nearly identical to the original. Both use a Phylon midsole and a large volume Zoom Air unit in the heel. However, one minor change between the two is the density of the Phylon itself. Itís a bit softer in the brand-new iteration thus giving a slightly softer feel under-foot. Donít expect anything drastically different from the OG, if youíve played in them, and definitely donít expect a bouncy forefoot ride, but despite the cushion-less forefoot ó theyíre still pretty comfortable. This Protro setup offers a lot of rear impact absorption, should you need it, while offering a very stable and low profile ride up front. If you enjoyed the original setup then youíll enjoy this version just as much. If youíve never had the chance to play in the original then youíre in for a treat as these are as close as it gets. If you were looking forward to full length Zoom Air then youíll be a little disappointed. Materials look damn near identical to what we saw on the original Kobe 4 back in 2009. First Gen Flywire midfoot panels are in place and work well. Iím not a huge fan of plastic and thread, but I canít complain at all about the performance. It works and itís durable. Not much else you can ask for. The leather throughout is still synthetic, but like the rubber and Phylon midsole, it feels a bit softer than the OG. I donít know if itís actually softer than it once was or if my OG pair were getting old and stiff/dried out. All I know is that this synthetic setup feels and acts like leather really well. So, like the first generation Flywire panels, nothing to complain about. It works. Itís durable. It breaks in nicely. They fit true to size then and they fit true to size now. There was a little bit of dead space or volume above the toe area to start but that went away once they materials broke-in ó which was very quick. Everything from the lacing to the last to the sculpt of the padding in the heel works just as good as it had. The fit is awesome. However, my favorite fitting shoe of all-time was the Jordan Release Date 2019. Yes, Iím already looking forward to those re-releasing next. Nothing has changed in this aspect. The heel counter is the same ó and it works great. The midfoot glass-based carbon fiber shank is still there ó and it works. The tooling is wide in the front while offering a small outrigger ó and it works. The Nike Kobe 4 is one of the greatest basketball shoes of all-time for a reason. Only one thing could have taken these from great to greater and that would have been the inclusion of forefoot cushion. Nike had ten years to think about what theyíd do to upgrade these babies and they could have done any number of things to make them slightly improved. React, Cushlon, forefoot Zoom Air, full length Zoom AirÖ yet, they did nothing. Not a swing and a miss, but a head scratcher for sure. Didnít Kobe specifically say he did not want his shoes to be Retroed unless they updated them to todayís standards? Maybe he wanted them to be on that Kyrie wave ó having no cushion at all. Maybe he didnít know the Kobe 4 was a Retro and not a Protro. Who knows. For $175 they could have, and should have, given us more. If not more then charge less. Are they cheaper than OG pairs found on the after market? Yes. Of course they are. But what does that have to do with anything? The fact is that we were told one thing while Nike did something else. Again. The shoe is still great, but if we want things to change then weíre going to have to start voting with our wallets. We canít use after market pricing, or the Kobe Bryant name, as an excuse as to why Nike is justified in ripping us off. Thatís what Jordan Brand has been doing and people are starting to understand that itís simply not worth it. I love the shoe, but I wonít let that blind me from the truth. This is not a Protro. Itís a Retro. Just like other all-time great performers, they still perform as great as the day they originally released. Just donít play us for fools. Be honest from the jump and people will decide for themselves whether or not the $175 is worth a purchase. And please, Nike, notify your retail partners of the typo. Theyíre still selling these things with the description ďFull-length Zoom Air unit means long-lasting responsiveness.Ē Mamba Face.
11 Maart 2019 Permanente link Google Feed MSN Reporter

(typ de letters en cijfers over)
:-) :-d ;-) :-o :-p (h) :-@ :-s :-$ :-( :'( :-| (a) (l) (6) (?) (!) (i) (>) (y)
Outlet NL female 140915 - 030216 468x60